If we give 20 girls the same assignment for strength, we are assuming that they are all at the same level of strength/capability/technical level, etc. The reality of the situation is that that this is rarely the case across all your strength and conditioning exercises. You create a situation where the more developed or stronger athlete’s won’t get any benefit, and at the same time we may be promoting compensation/lack of benefit for under developed athletes. I feel we need to use regressions or progressions in order to get people in their “Goldilocks” window for strength and conditioning. If we are just blanketing an general strength program of 3 sets of 10 handstand push ups or 40 leg lifts on a huge group with differences between them, I think it’s a recipe for disaster both in terms of safety and missing out on athletic performance development.
Read the whole article.
~~~
I’m not sure why so many gymnastics programs still demand uniformity with their strength where everyone does the same exercise despite the large gaps in ability. The one argument I can see for this uniform type is to monitor the gymnasts and keep an eye on quality.
Our team is relatively small at the gym I'm at. So it's been easy for me to individualize a skills & conditioning program for my level 3s, who I am primarily with on most rotations. I have 7 girls. An example of how I've tried catering toward individual needs is: A couple of them struggle at making 2-3 chin-ups without breaking form; one is at 11-in-a-row. The rest are somewhere around 5-6. Once they get to 10 with good form, I figure they have enough general strength and presence of mind on form that I start having them do it in a tuck with a foam block in the lap. The last rep does not count if they drop it on the eccentric phase. They have goals to increase their rep max and/or difficulty level each week; or improvement on quality. I figure that when it comes to chin-ups and leg-ups, 20 is about the maximum they need to do. Beyond that, I just don't think it's all that important. I think time is better spent in development on other areas, and I will be happy with them maintaining quality at peak 20 reps.
Sometimes I do have a general "everyone does this" routine, such as an ab circuit. Here, I don't give them a set number but time each exercise for 20 seconds with a 5 second break in-between. If a kid cannot maintain shape on a hollow body rock, she modifies it so it's manageable for that 20 seconds, with correct shaping.
Geddert on form and execution/quality over quantity:



